Two of three · the specimen collection

Reading a century of pressed plants

Museums hold Hawaiian plants collected as far back as 1792, each one photographed and each one showing plainly what it was doing on the day it was picked. Almost none of that has been written down as data. This is the software that reads it — running here, on this page, on real specimens.

8,590

Hawaiian specimens loaded

56

museums

1,918

species

1770–2026

years covered

Step one · running now

Find the parts of the sheet

Press the button. The software fetches a real museum specimen and locates the plant, the label, the colour strip and the packet holding loose seed — reporting how sure it is about each. Then it reads the label. Nothing here is a recording, and none of it is trained: it works from the physics of the image, which is why it runs on museums this project has never seen.

Pick a specimen

Specimen being parsed

BISH 790740 · Pandanus pulposus (Warb.) Martelli · Tuvalu · 1974

Step two · also running now

Train a model on them

Pick a question and a classifier learns from real specimens, then gets tested on ones it has never seen — in about half a second, in this tab, with no server involved. The third question is the one this project actually needs answered, and it is meant to fail. Showing where the method stops is what makes the rest of it worth believing.

What you are about to train

Is this specimen a fern?

Ferns look different from flowering plants at a glance — frond outlines, no flowers, a different way of filling the sheet. A simple model should do well, and if it does not, something is wrong with the setup rather than with the problem.

Split by species, not at random — every sheet of a species goes to one side or the other, so no near-duplicate of a training sheet can appear in the test. Splitting randomly would raise the score and mean nothing.

Step three · what the funding buys

Score what no database records

No museum field separates green fruit from ripe fruit. Neither does any field-observation vocabulary. Yet that is the distinction a control programme turns on.

It is plainly visible in the photograph, and nowhere else. So people with botanical training mark it up, and a model is trained on what they mark. The scoring tool splits fruit into immature, mature and dispersing, hides the collector’s own note until after you commit, and runs on the keyboard — because an expert’s hour is the binding constraint in this whole field.

Try scoring a specimen →

Served by the museums that hold them — this project stores pointers, never copies · see all 2,100

Specimens are searchable by island, elevation, family, museum, and by what the collector recorded about reproduction. A worked example follows one species end to end.